Yesterday’s
murders of five newspaper employees in Annapolis, Maryland, along with serious
injuries to two of their colleagues, has an all-too-familiar genesis.
The
dead employees, four reporters and a sales assistant for The Capital Gazette—a daily paper with a pedigree that originates
in the 18th century—were trapped behind a glass entry wall and their desks by
38-year-old Jarrod Ramos wielding a shotgun and homemade smoke bombs. The
shotgun had been legally purchased a year earlier.
Prior
to his deadly assault the shooter had barricaded the back door, preventing
several victims from escaping. Several surviving Gazette employees huddled under their desks when the shooter paused
to reload, at least two of them texting or twittering for help.
Ramos
had some years earlier embarked on an online social media campaign against a
former classmate from Arundel High School through Facebook and then by emails.
Ultimately, after criminal charges were brought against him, Ramos pleaded
guilty in July 2011 to criminal harassment. He was sentenced to 18
months of supervised probation, therapy, and no contact with his victim or her
loved ones.
A Gazette reporter Eric Hartley—who was
not one of the five murdered Gazette employees—interviewed the victim and
described in a 2011 column following the guilty plea how the Defendant had
stalked his victim online, terrifying her and, she believed, causing her to
lose her employment.
A
year after publication of the Gazette
article, the shooter sued Hartley, the Gazette, and the paper’s former editor
and publisher for defamation (actually, essentially for not describing the
harasser’s justification, such as it purported to be), but when the case came
up for trial the court found in favor of all defendants and dismissed the
action. Any attorney can tell you that the most common defense to a defamation
action is truth, and the Maryland court apparently held that the Gazette article had been accurate and
truthful.
The
shooter’s appeal of the adverse civil defamation judgment ended ultimately in
dismissal.
Refusing
to let the matter rest there, in response to the failure of his court case the
shooter then created a website further detailing his complaints against both the
reporter and the Gazette. He also
created a Twitter account that from time to time threatened the Gazette and
rattled its employees.
Hence,
in the seven years that elapsed between the shooter’s guilty plea in 2011 and
the actual murders yesterday, the shooter seems to have been obsessed with his
grievances against both the victim and more recently against the newspaper, and
felt ultimately impelled to go on a killing spree.
After
an intervening period of silence, the shooter posted a final message to the
world from his twitter feed the day of the murders, i.e., “Fuck you, leave me
alone.”
That’s
what young red-blooded American men do in this country to justify their right
to publicly pursue and harass women who reject them and to avenge their honor
when they are held accountable:
Kill
the bastards, as many of them as you can. Just pick up a gun and blow them all away.
The
shooter made no effort to flee the crime scene but was apprehended hiding
beneath one of the targeted Gazette
desks in the midst of the five dead and two injured employees he had shot, and
he surrendered his weapon to law enforcement with his hands up.
A coward to the end.
No comments:
Post a Comment